hi... is the list i found on this site up to date about the p4 chip buying ?

Probably not, Boardsort does not currently purchase the Pentium 4 chips other than as scrap because there is minimal demand for them nowadays. Wait for a second opinion because I could be wrong.

it should be up to date. that one is on the list for $2. i sent them some others on the list last month and got $3 each. it does have to test as good by boardsort. if not they give you no pin cpu rate for it.

The list is up to date. And things are regularly added and removed from it.

Keep in mind it’s not just value of cpu in the buying program, they need to have an active board with peripherals to test them. It’s more than just the voltage kits some tech use to sell on eBay.

I don’t know exactly how they test but it’s more than connecting four pins or a voltage pad testy
Without the kit to test it they can’t actually rest it. ;)

_________________
42 6F 61 72 64 73 6F 72 74 2E 63 6F 6D

I think there is confusion with your question about a P4 chip when the picture you reference is a P5 chip. As far as I know the available list is current and I just sent 8 in yesterday.

All right thanks for the info I'll do more research and ask more questions if needed.

If not a mistake or typo I guess it’s how you define architecture generations as well.

P1 was 486 overdrive, the Pentium, and the P-Pro.
P2 was the pentium III and pentium III slot processors. P3 was the pentium 3 socketed carrier, pentium 4, and 32bit core.
P4 was the 64-but Pentium/core chips.

That’s why it’s generally good to define chips with more details than a generic name and like here a photo.

Same for AMD, Phenom could be K7-K10.
FX can be k8-K…

Via v- series and v-architecture don’t line up.

Kind of like windows 10 being both Win6 and Win7

_________________
42 6F 61 72 64 73 6F 72 74 2E 63 6F 6D

For some reason I thought the Intel - Ix processors were P5 architecture.

Intel’s internal classification and external marketing are not in sync. Intel has a whole product spec history section At their site. Where cross-referencing part numbers to patent filings are not the same as the public marketing.
You’ll fine sites like OCR and Tom’s use internal numbers, most use public branding.

Publicly we’re on P7/Core.
And the pentium system has been dropped for the code name in marketing.

Internally it’s different.
One method has pentium being architecture 5 and the first being P5 based on the 80x(n)86 for pentium 80x586. P2 being the 80x686. P6 being the last of the line before switching to core as the chip architecture.
Yet we have also the pentium architectural steps as well, so yep, as I said m: confusing.
Which is why Chris used chip model numbers as stamped on the chip.

_________________
42 6F 61 72 64 73 6F 72 74 2E 63 6F 6D